Concepts
Grading policies
Categories, weights, precision and rounding: the four decisions behind every result, and why each is stated rather than assumed.
A grading policy is four decisions, and every one of them has a defensible alternative. That is exactly why the product asks a school to state them instead of choosing for it.
Categories and weights
A subject's result is built from assessments grouped into categories: assignments, class tests, examinations, or whatever the school calls them. Each category carries a weight, and the weights of a subject's categories total one hundred per cent.
A school that wants a different scheme for a subject states it for that subject. Nothing about a year group's scheme forces another year group's scheme.
Precision and rounding
Two decisions that look like details and are not:
- Precision is how many decimal places a mark is reported at.
- Rounding is what happens to the digits that do not fit.
A result at one decimal place and the same result at two are different numbers, and a ranking can change between them. The choice is recorded once, applied everywhere a result appears, and changed only with a date, so a past term keeps its own answer.
Term result
73.2
(72 x 30 + 64 x 30 + 81 x 40) / 100 = 73.2
Why the policy is written down
A parent asking why a child's result is 73.2 rather than 74 is asking a policy question. When the policy is stated, the answer is a sentence about the school's own decisions rather than a claim about the software. Results and publication describes what happens once the arithmetic is settled.